When people think about designing buildings, they often assume that the type of building—whether a house, office, or warehouse—dictates how it should be engineered.

The type of building is rarely the primary concern in the world of structural engineering

As structural engineers, we encounter this concern frequently: clients worry that if we haven’t designed a particular “type” of building before, the outcome may not meet their expectations.

But in truth, the type of building is rarely the primary concern in structural engineering.

The Unchanging Force of Gravity

One of the universal truths we work with is gravity, a constant force that acts on every structure, regardless of what it’s designed to be or where it’s located. Gravity pulls everything down at a rate of 9.8 m/s², and this relentless downward force applies vertical loads on every part of the building, from the roof down through every column, beam and loadbearing wall to the foundations.

structural calculations

Our role as engineers is to ensure that these vertical loads are safely transferred from the structure to the ground.

This principle applies to any building, whether it’s a school, a block of flats an office or a warehouse. The type of building doesn’t change the laws of physics; gravity remains constant, and our job is to make sure every design accommodates it.

The Varying Impact of Wind Loads

While gravity is a constant force, wind forces vary widely based on factors such as location, building height, and shape.

Wind can apply strong lateral forces that buildings need to withstand to maintain structural integrity. To manage these lateral forces, we incorporate design elements like bracing, shear walls, and moment frames into every project.

wind load


Again, the type of building doesn’t alter the basic requirements here—wind loads act on all structures, and the same engineering principles apply whether the building is a library or an office.


What Really Matters: Location, Use, and Layout

The key factors that influence a building’s structural design success are

  • its location
  • intended use, and
  • specific layout

not the type of building it is.

Each site has unique requirements based on its environment and how the building will be used. In fact, adaptability is one of the cornerstones of good structural engineering.

Designing structures that meet the unique demands of their specific location and purpose is what ensures stability, durability, and safety for occupants.

Why a successful building project needs a team

Typically the Architect will determine the layout to make the spaces work for the desired use, circulation of people (or maybe materials depending on use) flow through the building.  They are trained in this spatial planning.

Structural Engineers work with Architects to keep their schemes practical, structurally sound and safe.

And where needed other specialists such as building services engineers join to make the environment functional and comfortable.

A sound building project is a team effort, driven by the requirements of the Client.

Easing Client Concerns

Our experience designing diverse structures has shown us that the essential principles of engineering don’t change with the building type. Our knowledge of forces like gravity and wind, combined with our ability to assess site-specific needs, is what guarantees the safety and stability of any structure.

Ultimately, it’s not the type of building that determines its structural success—it’s the careful assessment of location, loads, and environmental factors. When clients understand this, they can feel confident that their project will stand the test of time, no matter its intended purpose.

“Gravity is a habit that is hard to shake off.” – Terry Pratchett

A recent report by CROSS- UK (Collaborative Reporting for Safer Structures) identified a potential disaster due to inadequate structural design.

cross logo


A Chartered Structural Engineer, was called upon to review the design for the removal of a loadbearing wall during a refurbishment and uncovered critical flaws that could have had dire consequences.


The Design

“The design showed four steel beams, steel columns, some lintels, and new foundations.

It did not show how applied loads had been calculated and did not allow for any wind loadings. No calculations had been provided to show how the beams should be framed with the columns to provide sway stability.

The structural information showed new foundations, but trial pits dug by the builder revealed competent existing foundations which could be reused.

The builder and building control body had agreed that two of the proposed new structural members could be omitted since there was no loading applied to them, and they were not required for reasons of stability”.

The design did not show how applied loads had been calculated and did not allow for any wind loadings – this was luckily picked up by a competent builder.


As minimum you should expect your structural engineer to;

cross report what to look for

Don’t be persuaded by a glossy website!

Lateral Stability

Unfortunately, some homeowners mistakenly assume that the walls they intend to remove serve solely to support vertical loads. However, these walls may actually play a crucial role in providing lateral stability for the entire building.

Buildings may collapse if walls are removed without measures to safeguard the overall stability of the building. Clients should understand that structural engineering, domestic work included, is a complex discipline that should only be entrusted to a suitably qualified and experienced person such as a professional civil or structural engineer.

In Conclusion

Efforts to communicate with the structural designer failed to resolve the issue, ultimately leading to a halt in construction.

Subsequent review revealed that the original designer had not visited the site, casting doubt on their competence and qualifications.

This incident underscores a widespread problem in the industry: individuals claiming to be structural designers without the requisite expertise.

These unqualified practitioners pose serious risks to public safety, as evidenced by reports from organisations like CROSS (Confidential Reporting on Structural Safety). The repercussions of inadequate design can be dire, potentially endangering lives and resulting in legal consequences.


Are you working on a project? Please get in touch today and one of our qualified Structural Engineers will be happy to advise you 0118 962 9666